- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
2026 Toyota C-HR EV Review: A Reborn Electric Crossover That’s Fun to Drive, but Held Back by Outdated Tech
Toyota excluded the C-HR from its U.S. lineup in 2022 but is completely reborn as an electric avatar. The C-HR adds to Toyota's EV portfolio and supports the refreshed bZ, bZ Woodland and three-row Highlander EVs as well as Subaru and Lexus. The C-HR is smaller than the bZ and is offered as an all-wheel drive sub-compact electric crossover in the segment, which mainly includes front-wheel drive models such as the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Bolt and Hyundai Kona Electric. Another AWD option here is Subaru Uncharted, the C-HR's badge engineering twin, which gives itself a niche.
After a week of testing, the C-HR felt a lot of fun from behind the wheel. It has enough real-world range and competitive fast charging speed. But the infotainment feels old-fashioned, and there's plenty of room for improvement in cabin ergonomics. In an era of software-defined vehicles and furious charging speeds, the C-HR feels rather inferior. It's still a decent overall EV, but I'm worried its strengths won't overcome its shortcomings.
Read More: Fastest Charging EVs of 2026: 10 Models That Dominate 10-80% Times
2026 Toyota C-HR Range and Efficiency
Like the new bZ, the C-HR gets 74.7 kilowatt-hour battery capacity and has a 287-mile EPA range on the SE trim, enough to deliver 273 miles on the XSE I drove. It's only available in AWD, but if FWD and more ranges are what you're asking for, the identical Subaru Uncharted is worth a look. The highway test observed 3.7 miles per kWh, which rose to a respectable 5.0 miles per kWh in the city. Driving conditions were good, and temperatures in the 70s and 80s were basically the sweet spot for lithium-ion batteries. In cold climates, expect that figure to fall.
Still, I never felt a creeping range of anxiety during the week. That's partly credit to the car, but it reflects how mature the charging infrastructure in the Tri-State area of New York has been over the past few years. With poor charging infrastructure, even a decent EV can look inadequate, but having a high-power, reliable fast charger everywhere makes low-range EVs much more viable.
Read More: Volvo EX60 First Drive Review: 400 Miles of Range, 670 Hp, Gemini Navigation. Fixes The EX30 & EX90's Mistakes
2026 Toyota C-HR Charging Test
Toyota says it can charge from 10% to 80% in 30 minutes, and my observations were equivalent to those claims. 15% to 80% took 26 minutes, and the C-HR added a range of 191 miles at that time. It took me 48 minutes to get to 100%. Most Teslas take 10-80% to charge 25-35 minutes, while similar priced Hyundai Ioniq 5 can do the same in 20 minutes with an architecture of 800 volts and a peak charging speed of 350 kW. The charging performance of the C-HR still felt reasonable in that company. It has a flat charging curve up to about 60% and then gradually tapers off. The charging curve did not drop sharply, and the maximum speed slowed to about 135 KW at 20%, 50% at 120kW, and 60% at 110kW. At 100%, the car displayed an EPA- 273-mile range. Flipping the AC with a full blast knocked it down to 250 miles, but this is still viable for road travel.
Read More: 2026 XPeng G9 Review: The Luxury Electric SUV That Aims to Unseat the Germans
Of course, none of this will win the bragging rights to the C-HR in 2026, especially in an era when charging speeds of 300+ kW are becoming the norm. However, from 26 minutes to 80%, about 250 available miles are practical. It's roughly the time it takes to drink coffee, use the toilet and stretch your legs, and it's like a break to take on a long drive anyway. It is also worth remembering where Toyota was just a few years ago. The bZ4x before the facelift was terrible to charge, making long trips a practice of patience. The bZ in 2026 is a meaningful advance, and the C-HR is sharing the platform and powertrain and realizing those improvements.
2026 Toyota C-HR Performance, Ride, Handling
At 338 horsepower, standard AWD, and only 0-60 miles per hour in 4.9 seconds, the C-HR accelerates hard and purposefully. Turn off the traction control, place the throttle on the floor and the front wheels spin up like a hot hatch. Except for eco and standard driving modes, you don't get much adjustment capability. The standard setting has enough bellow for daily driving, overtaking and highway cruising.
The ride at city speed is on the harder side, and small and large potholes are filtered into the cabin with lateral impacts. But the ride felt more calm with the accumulation of speed. But the setup of this suspension wasn't as sophisticated as I expected. Expansion joints were accompanied by loud and unrefined thuds, which is what more accurately rebound damping can be solved. By comparison, the bZ feels much more comfortable, and other cars in this price range, like the Ioniq5 and Leaf, also ride with considerable composure.
It lost some points in the ride, but it won them back in the handling. The C-HR is 5 inches shorter than the bZ and has a smaller footprint, which makes it surprisingly laughable in the corners. It doesn't have as many hinges as the GR Corolla or the Ioniq5N, but I found it attractive enough for mainstream EVs. The only thing holding it up was the steering, which lacked the directness and load feel that would fit really well with the rest of the handling package.
2026 Toyota C-HR Technology and Software
Despite being launched simultaneously with the new RAV4, the C-HR gets an older version of Toyota's infotainment system. Both the latest RAV4 and the new Lexus ES are much more responsive, smartphone-like, along with native route plans that suggest stopping charging along the way. C-HR gets none of that. The 14-inch touchscreen itself looks big, sharp and modern, but the experience feels behind a generation. The startup is slow, sometimes delayed, and lacks the polish you'd expect with the new EV.
Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay will cover the day-to-day needs of most owners, but beyond phone mirroring, there's not much in terms of meaningful features. A Toyota spokesperson told me that the current model years bZ, C-HR, and bZ Woodland lack the hardware and software architecture needed to support the Arene platform. They declined to comment on whether future model years will get those upgrades.
Thankfully, the smartphone ecosystem is beginning to make up for some of these shortcomings. Apple Maps will support EV routing, and Google is expected to bring similar functionality to Android Auto soon. And that could help Toyota's electrical products become more attractive if they function similarly to some of the native systems of Tesla, Rivian and GM's EVs. There is another frustrating issue with C-HR. Like the bZ, the steering wheel is partially bobbing up and down like an ostrich trying to find the right viewing angle I can see the speedometer, battery percentage, or range estimate without awkwardly craning my neck After a week, my neck muscles gave up, and I had to pop painkillers.
The only way I could see the gauge cluster correctly was that the seat was fully lifted and the steering wheel entered the driver's seat position of the truck at its lowest position. The whole setup felt like it was designed by a 6'5" engineer who forgot that there are some small human beings living on the same planet. Even when the display is on, the information layout itself is cluttered and oddly not intuitive. Important data, such as battery percentage and range, are not noticeable enough, forcing your eyes to look at the screen longer than necessary, and can be dangerous and distracting.
Verdict
With a starting price of $ 38,595, the C-HR will finally land in a segment that is starting to get interesting. Join the Tesla Model 3, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Chevrolet Equinox EV, Chevrolet Bolt, Nissan Leaf, and Toyota BZ for an increasingly crowded EV space of $40,000 or less. Against that background, the C-HR brings a few legitimate strengths to the table. Its range and charging performance are competitive and fun to drive. Its small footprint allows it to negotiate tight spaces with surprising ease.
Both the bolt and the leaf significantly start at the sharply $30,000 price range, while the C-HR just gets phone mirroring, and the more advanced native Google Infotainment they don't get AWD like Toyota, but for that price you'll get larger models like Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Chevy Equinox EV. It is close to the AWD competitors that you can afford. The sixth generation Toyota RAV4, I also reviewed recently, felt much more modern and roomier than the C-HR despite being driven by gasoline while also costing significantly less. It starts at $33,495 at the destination. It's usually rare for a brand-new EV in 2026 to feel older than a burning car, but that's pretty awful, because somehow the C-HR manages exactly that.
Indeed, Toyota's EV attack this year looks much more serious than before. But C-HR also feels like a reminder that new doesn't automatically translate to convincing. For now, EVs still feel like a side quest as the company's real energy, investment, and engineering focus is firmly centered around hot-selling hybrids, especially in the Western market.
After a week of testing, the C-HR felt a lot of fun from behind the wheel. It has enough real-world range and competitive fast charging speed. But the infotainment feels old-fashioned, and there's plenty of room for improvement in cabin ergonomics. In an era of software-defined vehicles and furious charging speeds, the C-HR feels rather inferior. It's still a decent overall EV, but I'm worried its strengths won't overcome its shortcomings.
Read More: Fastest Charging EVs of 2026: 10 Models That Dominate 10-80% Times
2026 Toyota C-HR Range and Efficiency
Like the new bZ, the C-HR gets 74.7 kilowatt-hour battery capacity and has a 287-mile EPA range on the SE trim, enough to deliver 273 miles on the XSE I drove. It's only available in AWD, but if FWD and more ranges are what you're asking for, the identical Subaru Uncharted is worth a look. The highway test observed 3.7 miles per kWh, which rose to a respectable 5.0 miles per kWh in the city. Driving conditions were good, and temperatures in the 70s and 80s were basically the sweet spot for lithium-ion batteries. In cold climates, expect that figure to fall.
Still, I never felt a creeping range of anxiety during the week. That's partly credit to the car, but it reflects how mature the charging infrastructure in the Tri-State area of New York has been over the past few years. With poor charging infrastructure, even a decent EV can look inadequate, but having a high-power, reliable fast charger everywhere makes low-range EVs much more viable.
Read More: Volvo EX60 First Drive Review: 400 Miles of Range, 670 Hp, Gemini Navigation. Fixes The EX30 & EX90's Mistakes
2026 Toyota C-HR Charging Test
Toyota says it can charge from 10% to 80% in 30 minutes, and my observations were equivalent to those claims. 15% to 80% took 26 minutes, and the C-HR added a range of 191 miles at that time. It took me 48 minutes to get to 100%. Most Teslas take 10-80% to charge 25-35 minutes, while similar priced Hyundai Ioniq 5 can do the same in 20 minutes with an architecture of 800 volts and a peak charging speed of 350 kW. The charging performance of the C-HR still felt reasonable in that company. It has a flat charging curve up to about 60% and then gradually tapers off. The charging curve did not drop sharply, and the maximum speed slowed to about 135 KW at 20%, 50% at 120kW, and 60% at 110kW. At 100%, the car displayed an EPA- 273-mile range. Flipping the AC with a full blast knocked it down to 250 miles, but this is still viable for road travel.
Read More: 2026 XPeng G9 Review: The Luxury Electric SUV That Aims to Unseat the Germans
Of course, none of this will win the bragging rights to the C-HR in 2026, especially in an era when charging speeds of 300+ kW are becoming the norm. However, from 26 minutes to 80%, about 250 available miles are practical. It's roughly the time it takes to drink coffee, use the toilet and stretch your legs, and it's like a break to take on a long drive anyway. It is also worth remembering where Toyota was just a few years ago. The bZ4x before the facelift was terrible to charge, making long trips a practice of patience. The bZ in 2026 is a meaningful advance, and the C-HR is sharing the platform and powertrain and realizing those improvements.
2026 Toyota C-HR Performance, Ride, Handling
At 338 horsepower, standard AWD, and only 0-60 miles per hour in 4.9 seconds, the C-HR accelerates hard and purposefully. Turn off the traction control, place the throttle on the floor and the front wheels spin up like a hot hatch. Except for eco and standard driving modes, you don't get much adjustment capability. The standard setting has enough bellow for daily driving, overtaking and highway cruising.
The ride at city speed is on the harder side, and small and large potholes are filtered into the cabin with lateral impacts. But the ride felt more calm with the accumulation of speed. But the setup of this suspension wasn't as sophisticated as I expected. Expansion joints were accompanied by loud and unrefined thuds, which is what more accurately rebound damping can be solved. By comparison, the bZ feels much more comfortable, and other cars in this price range, like the Ioniq5 and Leaf, also ride with considerable composure.
It lost some points in the ride, but it won them back in the handling. The C-HR is 5 inches shorter than the bZ and has a smaller footprint, which makes it surprisingly laughable in the corners. It doesn't have as many hinges as the GR Corolla or the Ioniq5N, but I found it attractive enough for mainstream EVs. The only thing holding it up was the steering, which lacked the directness and load feel that would fit really well with the rest of the handling package.
2026 Toyota C-HR Technology and Software
Despite being launched simultaneously with the new RAV4, the C-HR gets an older version of Toyota's infotainment system. Both the latest RAV4 and the new Lexus ES are much more responsive, smartphone-like, along with native route plans that suggest stopping charging along the way. C-HR gets none of that. The 14-inch touchscreen itself looks big, sharp and modern, but the experience feels behind a generation. The startup is slow, sometimes delayed, and lacks the polish you'd expect with the new EV.
Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay will cover the day-to-day needs of most owners, but beyond phone mirroring, there's not much in terms of meaningful features. A Toyota spokesperson told me that the current model years bZ, C-HR, and bZ Woodland lack the hardware and software architecture needed to support the Arene platform. They declined to comment on whether future model years will get those upgrades.
Thankfully, the smartphone ecosystem is beginning to make up for some of these shortcomings. Apple Maps will support EV routing, and Google is expected to bring similar functionality to Android Auto soon. And that could help Toyota's electrical products become more attractive if they function similarly to some of the native systems of Tesla, Rivian and GM's EVs. There is another frustrating issue with C-HR. Like the bZ, the steering wheel is partially bobbing up and down like an ostrich trying to find the right viewing angle I can see the speedometer, battery percentage, or range estimate without awkwardly craning my neck After a week, my neck muscles gave up, and I had to pop painkillers.
The only way I could see the gauge cluster correctly was that the seat was fully lifted and the steering wheel entered the driver's seat position of the truck at its lowest position. The whole setup felt like it was designed by a 6'5" engineer who forgot that there are some small human beings living on the same planet. Even when the display is on, the information layout itself is cluttered and oddly not intuitive. Important data, such as battery percentage and range, are not noticeable enough, forcing your eyes to look at the screen longer than necessary, and can be dangerous and distracting.
Verdict
With a starting price of $ 38,595, the C-HR will finally land in a segment that is starting to get interesting. Join the Tesla Model 3, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Chevrolet Equinox EV, Chevrolet Bolt, Nissan Leaf, and Toyota BZ for an increasingly crowded EV space of $40,000 or less. Against that background, the C-HR brings a few legitimate strengths to the table. Its range and charging performance are competitive and fun to drive. Its small footprint allows it to negotiate tight spaces with surprising ease.
Both the bolt and the leaf significantly start at the sharply $30,000 price range, while the C-HR just gets phone mirroring, and the more advanced native Google Infotainment they don't get AWD like Toyota, but for that price you'll get larger models like Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Chevy Equinox EV. It is close to the AWD competitors that you can afford. The sixth generation Toyota RAV4, I also reviewed recently, felt much more modern and roomier than the C-HR despite being driven by gasoline while also costing significantly less. It starts at $33,495 at the destination. It's usually rare for a brand-new EV in 2026 to feel older than a burning car, but that's pretty awful, because somehow the C-HR manages exactly that.
Indeed, Toyota's EV attack this year looks much more serious than before. But C-HR also feels like a reminder that new doesn't automatically translate to convincing. For now, EVs still feel like a side quest as the company's real energy, investment, and engineering focus is firmly centered around hot-selling hybrids, especially in the Western market.
Comments
Post a Comment